2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions

Social Media

TOPIC: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12172

rd7839 OFFLINE Endurance Racer Posts: 625	I knew you were cheating! It can't be my driving that keeps me finishing second to you very time!
	Reply Quote

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12173

JerryW OFFLINE Endurance Racer If you feel in control you arent going fast enough Posts: 659	rd7839 wrote: I knew you were cheating! It can't be my driving that keeps me finishing second to you very time! It's not JUST your driving
	Jerry Whitteridge Norcal #552 Reply Quote

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12175

loftygoals
OFFLINE
Senior Racer
Posts: 97

B1BFlyer wrote:

BJ will likely have it at his shop anyway.

I just crawled out from under your car... besides what we discussed, I just noticed you have a rear exhaust mount broken. We'll weld that up.

Anyway, thanks for donating your car to the cause. I'd love to get a Texas dyno day put together. I'm especially interested in your car, because it seems to out motor everyone else--even the 88 high compression motors.

-bj

Reply Quote

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12177

loftygoals
OFFLINE
Senior Racer
Posts: 97

944Racer72 wrote:

If verified true...

I agree, but like you said, it would need to be verified.

944Racer72 wrote:

Is it possible to deck the block enough to meaningfully raise compression on these engines? Would that be a financially viable substitute for head shaving that when using the late head with LC pistons would yield the best of both worlds (combustion chamber shape + compression) without HC pistons? Does the head thickness check take into account block decking?

I would recommend against decking the block for a number of reasons, but to answer your question, no the current check doesn't account for decking the block.

As inefficient as these motors are, I don't think changing the cylinder head compression chamber shape will amount to any actual performance change. Again, only testing will tell us.

-bj

Reply Quote

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12181

RacerX OFFLINE Endurance Racer Posts: 351	loftygoals wrote: I would recommend against decking the block for a number of reasons, but to answer your question, no the current check doesn't account for decking the block. -bj Can you explain why.
	Ken Frey #3 944-Spec MW Region "Racing is life! Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." Check out my build thread!! www.944-spec.org/944SPEC/forum/race-car-...d/9155-new-car-build Reply Quote

Re: 2012 Rules Change Proposals Decisions 12 years, 5 months ago #12186

joepaluch OFFLINE Moderator Posts: 1483	FastTater wrote: What about using a turbo cam? Legal and go for it. Heck if you are running and 84 motor you already have one. Turbos use the 83-85 NA cam.
	Joe Paluch 944 Spec #94 Gina Marie Paper Designs Arizona Regional 944 Spec Director, National Rules Coordinator 2006 Az Champion - 944 Spec Racer Since 2002 Reply Quote